- #NEW MAC MINI HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2018 HOW TO#
- #NEW MAC MINI HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2018 UPGRADE#
- #NEW MAC MINI HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2018 PRO#
I respectfully disagree with your take on this.Īs for opening it up, that’s a non-issue. External power supply means additional hardware can be added. Why? An internal power supply takes up space and by far generates the most heat of any component.
They just want a cheap monitor with this because color and hi rez isn’t that important to them. Additionally, I know of people who don’t want to spend the money on an iMac monitor. A lot of people buy them because they’re upgradable more easily than an IMac. I’ve upgraded a number of Mini’s for people, and I know of others who have done it themselves.
#NEW MAC MINI HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2018 UPGRADE#
What cases would those be for the masses? What is the ratio of users who will actually upgrade the storage versus those who would never open it for any reason now matter how easy it would be to access it? Two easily accessible m.2 slots would make the mac mini far more desirable for a broader number of use cases. If the internal power supply is eliminated - it should be for an actual user benefit. A PS5 shouldn't be more expandable than a desktop computer in 2022.
#NEW MAC MINI HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2018 PRO#
Five years from now a M1 Pro or Max will still be a decent processor but the SSD will seem very slow and cramped. This would greatly extend the useful life of the Mac Mini and would be trivial for Apple to add as the SSD's only connector is on its end.
Not a removal of the underside and difficult installation but an actual slot into which you insert a SSD stick complete with heat sink. Another problem would be for commercial customers with a lot of these, while one port can theoretically handle 100 watts under this scheme, the entire router would likely not be able to handle several of these at once. And lots of people are just using their network over WiFi. It will take years for the new standard to propagate out enough for Apple to assure themselves that someone buying a Mini would be certain of its working via PoE, so it don’t believe it’s reasonable to expect it.
PS: I don't know if I've ever seen Type 4 in action and have no idea if such devices are in production.
#NEW MAC MINI HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT 2018 HOW TO#
Unless we see this as an already growing segment for rack servers -or- Apple has a very large customer that wants this and figured out how to make it work) which could be themselves) then I don't see it even being on the table. I've only ever seen PoE in 10/100/1000 ports, but that could be simply be due to cost or need, not a technical issue-for example, you don't need that much data for an IP phone. I also don't know PoE could be affected by 10 GigE, which is an option in the Mac mini. Now, I'm sure there are applications where a much more expensive PoE Layer 2 or 3 device is advantageous, but it's definitely not the norm. Additionally, there's significantly more heat and dissipation with PoE's DC current over your standard. Not because we like wires, but because we like to isolate problems and separating power and data is more ideal for both troubleshooting down the road and from a cost perspective up front. In terms of the rack I, personally, have yet to see such a setup being utilized. It's also possible that it won't looking at the now 140W PSU in the new 16" M1 Max MacBook Pro. Now, the 2020 M1 Mac mini was fairly unchanged from the hungry Intel version and I've shown Apple has dramatically altered the PSU capacity so it's possible that it could be smaller. On the Mac mini side, the current Mac mini allowed for 150W continuous (which is a change over the 2014 model which allowed for 85W, and before that it was 110W and before that started out at 85W). However, there are some minor to major issues that make this extremely unlikely. That would reduce the number of cables and it's absolutely possible with available tech and 802.3bt Type 4, which provides up to 100W per port (and 71W per powered device). That sure would simplify a lot of rack wiring!
I can see server farms buying palette-loads of these for cloud services.